<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Mediocrity is underrated (or better is the enemy of good enough)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://nayna.org/blog/?feed=rss2&#038;p=11" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://nayna.org/blog/?p=11</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 Jun 2010 04:22:37 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Flow &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Daily Digest for September 20th - The zeitgeist daily</title>
		<link>http://nayna.org/blog/?p=11&#038;cpage=1#comment-1449</link>
		<dc:creator>Flow &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Daily Digest for September 20th - The zeitgeist daily</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Sep 2009 08:17:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nayna.org/blog/?p=11#comment-1449</guid>
		<description>[...] Shared Mediocrity is underrated (or better is the enemy of good enough) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Shared Mediocrity is underrated (or better is the enemy of good enough) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jacques Chester</title>
		<link>http://nayna.org/blog/?p=11&#038;cpage=1#comment-1445</link>
		<dc:creator>Jacques Chester</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Sep 2009 03:56:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nayna.org/blog/?p=11#comment-1445</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;All companies have a theme running through them – we are the best, we are the most innovative, we love our employees the most. We do the most interesting work, we will challenge you the most.

As far as I know, there is no company that says -” We are ok. We could be better, but thats not our priority.”&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Which parallel universe do you come from and how can I move there?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>All companies have a theme running through them – we are the best, we are the most innovative, we love our employees the most. We do the most interesting work, we will challenge you the most.</p>
<p>As far as I know, there is no company that says -” We are ok. We could be better, but thats not our priority.”</p></blockquote>
<p>Which parallel universe do you come from and how can I move there?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bharat Ram</title>
		<link>http://nayna.org/blog/?p=11&#038;cpage=1#comment-1444</link>
		<dc:creator>Bharat Ram</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Sep 2009 01:57:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nayna.org/blog/?p=11#comment-1444</guid>
		<description>MS Word did not locate any spelling errors in this piece. A case of mediocrity canceling out mediocrity or excellence masquerading as mediocrity.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>MS Word did not locate any spelling errors in this piece. A case of mediocrity canceling out mediocrity or excellence masquerading as mediocrity.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel Nicolas</title>
		<link>http://nayna.org/blog/?p=11&#038;cpage=1#comment-1442</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel Nicolas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Sep 2009 01:28:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nayna.org/blog/?p=11#comment-1442</guid>
		<description>icrosoft was a spectacular success because they were the best at business, absolutely ruthless, cut throat, litigious wheeling dealing, spending hundreds of hours a week working on both the product and the business sides
bill gates is/was the richest dude in the world because he had a vision where everyone had a personal computer, running windows, and he made it happen.
that&#039;s not &quot;oh i&#039;m going to make a mediocre product and make &#039;just enough&#039; business deals to be profitable&quot;
Is Microsoft now able to take their existing client base and sell shitty products to them and mediocre, barely acceptable upgrades, and compete? yeah, sure.  but that&#039;s not why they&#039;re a spectacular success.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>icrosoft was a spectacular success because they were the best at business, absolutely ruthless, cut throat, litigious wheeling dealing, spending hundreds of hours a week working on both the product and the business sides<br />
bill gates is/was the richest dude in the world because he had a vision where everyone had a personal computer, running windows, and he made it happen.<br />
that&#8217;s not &#8220;oh i&#8217;m going to make a mediocre product and make &#8216;just enough&#8217; business deals to be profitable&#8221;<br />
Is Microsoft now able to take their existing client base and sell shitty products to them and mediocre, barely acceptable upgrades, and compete? yeah, sure.  but that&#8217;s not why they&#8217;re a spectacular success.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Don Livingston</title>
		<link>http://nayna.org/blog/?p=11&#038;cpage=1#comment-1441</link>
		<dc:creator>Don Livingston</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Sep 2009 22:44:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nayna.org/blog/?p=11#comment-1441</guid>
		<description>While you have some valid points, and I admit there are times when a person or an organization needs to accept thier limitations, and work with &quot;good enough.&quot; However, I submit that it is better to set a few lofty (yet realistic) goals. There is a difference between striving for excellence, and accepting when you fall short, and always looking for the short-cut to just get by. It is this latter outlook that has been the downfall of the U.S. auto industry. 
&quot;Its better to aim for the sun and miss than to aim for a dung pile and hit it.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While you have some valid points, and I admit there are times when a person or an organization needs to accept thier limitations, and work with &#8220;good enough.&#8221; However, I submit that it is better to set a few lofty (yet realistic) goals. There is a difference between striving for excellence, and accepting when you fall short, and always looking for the short-cut to just get by. It is this latter outlook that has been the downfall of the U.S. auto industry.<br />
&#8220;Its better to aim for the sun and miss than to aim for a dung pile and hit it.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Foobar</title>
		<link>http://nayna.org/blog/?p=11&#038;cpage=1#comment-1440</link>
		<dc:creator>Foobar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Sep 2009 21:55:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nayna.org/blog/?p=11#comment-1440</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m basically terrified because I can&#039;t figure out 2 things. 

a) if you are joking or not. 
b) if I agree or not. 

:D</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m basically terrified because I can&#8217;t figure out 2 things. </p>
<p>a) if you are joking or not.<br />
b) if I agree or not. </p>
<p> <img src='http://nayna.org/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif' alt=':D' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alecu</title>
		<link>http://nayna.org/blog/?p=11&#038;cpage=1#comment-1439</link>
		<dc:creator>Alecu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Sep 2009 18:51:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nayna.org/blog/?p=11#comment-1439</guid>
		<description>Haha, nice essay! I get your point ... it makes sense in the software business.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Haha, nice essay! I get your point &#8230; it makes sense in the software business.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fred</title>
		<link>http://nayna.org/blog/?p=11&#038;cpage=1#comment-1438</link>
		<dc:creator>Fred</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Sep 2009 18:05:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nayna.org/blog/?p=11#comment-1438</guid>
		<description>Meh. This article was alright...but it could have been better.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Meh. This article was alright&#8230;but it could have been better.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Grok2</title>
		<link>http://nayna.org/blog/?p=11&#038;cpage=1#comment-1437</link>
		<dc:creator>Grok2</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Sep 2009 16:36:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nayna.org/blog/?p=11#comment-1437</guid>
		<description>Wow. You got me thinking whether mediocrity is really good, but then I got distracted by your later paragraphs. Rather than concentrate on the topic, I was left wondering if you were really making fun of mediocrity...hmm. Good write-up though.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow. You got me thinking whether mediocrity is really good, but then I got distracted by your later paragraphs. Rather than concentrate on the topic, I was left wondering if you were really making fun of mediocrity&#8230;hmm. Good write-up though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Llessur</title>
		<link>http://nayna.org/blog/?p=11&#038;cpage=1#comment-1436</link>
		<dc:creator>Llessur</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Sep 2009 16:13:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nayna.org/blog/?p=11#comment-1436</guid>
		<description>Ironically, I skipped to the last paragraph to see if you had a point beyond the title. You didn&#039;t, so that&#039;s good enough for me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ironically, I skipped to the last paragraph to see if you had a point beyond the title. You didn&#8217;t, so that&#8217;s good enough for me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
